The Morgan Report Blog

January 2010 –The Morgan Report

 The Morgan Report 2010

As we do every January, we will give an outline of several resource companies, particularly
from the silver sector. We divide these up, first looking at top-tier companies. We address
some of the companies currently in the speculative portfolio. We also look at many of
the companies we have reported on in previous reports. We go the extra mile, meaning
we actually go to each and every company and ask for their milestones for 2010. Almost
all the companies respond, but a few do not.

To the best of our knowledge we are the only report/newsletter of our type that actually
puts the respective company’s feet to the fire and asks them what their plans and
milestones are for the year ahead. This is quite an undertaking and is exhausting to say
the least. Others in our industry put out a similar report with about half as many
companies and charge for that one report, more than what we charge for basic service.

 But we did not stop there this year, we also have an outlook for Rare Earths as outlined
below.

Entering the Great Unknown: Rare Earths in 2010

By Clint Cox

 2009 has been called “the Year of Rare Earths” by those in the industry. It was
tremendously exciting for the industry to be thrust into the spotlight.

I will admit that I missed the great rare earth run of 2009 in the junior exploration
companies. I tend to be very conservative in my analysis, and this often causes me to
miss opportunities in the junior mining sector. Even though I have discussed the risk of
the rare earths in The Morgan Report repeatedly, I feel the need to emphasize this
aspect once again.

First, let us begin with the current status of the rare earth elements (REEs) sector. The
mainstream media is now covering the rare earths on a regular basis—here are a couple
of the recent offerings: Members Only continue

I want to take this opportunity to thank all of our loyal subscribers for the support and
comments throughout 2009. Most of our speculative holdings are now positive again
and most of our Top Asset Companies continue to improve building shareholder value.

 The website www.Silver-Investor.com will be changed to a new and easier to navigate
site in early 2010. Most of my public dialogue will be done in Blog style which frees me
up from getting up at the crack of dawn every weekday to sort through the news
personally and post the most important articles pertaining to money, metals, and mining.

With that I do wish you excellent health in the New Year, and increased wealth as well.

Sincerely,
David Morgan
Founder www.Silver-Investor.com

David Morgan on the Junior Miners

9/2/2009
by John Rubino

The precious metals juniors have had a nice pop in the past few months. But according to David Morgan, veteran silver analyst and publisher of The Morgan Report, the real fun is just beginning. We spoke recently about why the sector has a bright future and how to tell the real companies from the story stocks.

DollarCollapse: Why do the juniors look good right now?

David Morgan: First of all, they’re still undervalued. There are projects out there that are selling for less than their cash on hand. Many more are selling for less than a reasonable liquidation value. Once you’re on the floor you can push as hard as you want and you’re not going below the floor, so the juniors look like the best part of the resource sector at the present time.

The only negative is that we’re approaching more volatility in all the markets. There is a possibility in my view that there could be one more smashing of the general financial sector. The large miners tend to go along with the general equity market. So a huge sell-off in the stock market in October would damage the large cap miners such as Newmont Mining and GoldCorp. Will it take down the juniors? Probably not. You might see some of these stocks sell off a bit, but they’re already washed out.

DC: How big a part of the story is M&A, with the majors buying up the juniors?

DM: It’s a very big part of the story. Basically when the credit crunch started to manifest globally in 2008, companies that had cash positions were sitting like vultures on the telephone line looking at the companies with good projects that were selling at less than asset value. Lots of mergers and acquisitions took place. The big companies didn’t have any problem at all getting credit.

But I don’t spend a lot of time looking for potential takeovers. I approach these companies on a value basis. With commodities, whether you get metal out of the ground in Canada or South Africa, it’s all the same, it’s fungible. So with a big company what you want to look for is the balance sheet and income statement. Who’s making the most profit on the same product? I’m simplifying but that gives you the general idea. But move down to the juniors and that’s more of an art, a much more difficult process. Where are they, who’s managing it, how much cash do they have in the bank, have they done it before? But some of these projects are only so far advanced and they’re in good shape but are sitting there without anyone other than bigger companies paying attention.

DC: But you don’t like “story stocks”…

DM: I’m conservative, which comes with experience. I started in this sector at a very early age and was going to get rich quick. I bought every penny stock on the Vancouver exchange that I had money for, and my thinking was that if I just picked the right juniors it would just be a question of waiting a fixed amount of time and these things would go to the moon. But then I calmed down, saw my losses, and started to learn more. The truth of the matter is that on a grassroots exploration company your shot is about one in 2,000. That’s better than the lottery but it’s not as advantageous as a lot of people think. So part of my job is to separate the real companies from the story stocks. Again, I want to state that I am not primarily a junior mining stock picker, I focus much more on making money safely in the sector much like someone managing a gold fund, but we do not manage money.

DC: What do you need to see in order to move a company from story to real?

DM: You need to see the story coming true according to plan. There’s a sweet spot to buy a stock and it’s always higher than where it was when it started. When a company is just an idea or a great story, that’s usually as cheap as it’s going to get. Very few great stories come true, but if it begins to come true, the market will bid it up. But it can still be undervalued. And once you know a lot about it, let’s say 80% comes true and the other 20% is coming, there’s a point where there’s enough volume and news and knowns-versus-unknowns that you can buy the stock pretty safely and still see a lot of upside. I’d rather buy a $2 stock that goes to $8 in a year than a stock at 12-cents that takes ten years to go to $8.

We had Silver Standard (SSRI), for instance, at 65 cents. I was one of the first other than Adrian Day to recommend it, but [later on] you could buy that stock at $5 and still have a lot of upside. They kept adding shares but at the same time they were adding more silver ounces per share. So there’s your sweet spot: For a while you could buy something that was getting more undervalued the more shares they issued.

DC: So who are the next Silver Standards out there?

DM: I don’t think there will be another Silver Standard for a while but I’ll give you a conservative pick. Energold (EGD.V) is a drilling company with a unique drill that’s used all over the world. It’s a very efficiently run company, with management that’s excellent. The sweetener on this one is that it owns a pretty good percentage of Impact Silver (IPT.V). They’re mining silver at a profit, a small operation with lots of growth potential. So you’ve got an operating company with solid contracts and a pretty good slice of Impact Silver. This is as solid a speculation as any on our list.

One of my earliest recommendations is Mines Management (MGN). I know the management quite well. It’s developing a huge property, over a billion pounds of copper and a quarter million ounces of silver in Montana. It’s not a super-rich project. It’s been advanced substantially over the last several years but they’re not mining yet. If something happens in the future they don’t have a fallback position, so this adds to the risk. However, it’s so undervalued that it’s a reasonable speculation. If you put this on a graph of ounces in the ground per dollar invested it’s well undervalued relative to its peers.

The Morgan Report Blog